corporate law
21.08.2026
When a shareholder’s silence can
stop the company
from working
from working
how we helped unblock the management of a Cyprus company when one of its two shareholders stopped responding
The situation
A Cyprus company had two corporate shareholders with equal shares, 50/50. The director and secretary had also been appointed by both sides at registration.
Several years later one of the shareholders stopped responding. The director appointed by the other shareholder resigned, and on that side the company effectively had no management left.
The second shareholder wanted to replace the director and secretary to restore the company’s operations. But the company’s articles required unanimous shareholder approval for any board decisions. And it was impossible to reach the other shareholder.
Several years later one of the shareholders stopped responding. The director appointed by the other shareholder resigned, and on that side the company effectively had no management left.
The second shareholder wanted to replace the director and secretary to restore the company’s operations. But the company’s articles required unanimous shareholder approval for any board decisions. And it was impossible to reach the other shareholder.
Can a director of a Cyprus company resign without the shareholder’s consent? As a general rule, yes: a director can resign unilaterally. But appointing a new one without the other shareholder’s consent is not possible if the articles require unanimity.
Can a director of a Cyprus company resign without the shareholder’s consent? As a general rule, yes: a director can resign unilaterally. But appointing a new one without the other shareholder’s consent is not possible if the articles require unanimity.
Client’s request
- Can the current director resign and appoint a new director and secretary without the second shareholder’s consent?
- If consent is required, what legal consequences does the company face if the changes are made without it, and what measures can the missing shareholder take?
- Will the missing shareholder later be able to challenge and annul transactions signed by the new director?
What we did
We studied the company’s articles and the Companies Law of the Republic of Cyprus.
The articles limited the directors’ powers: any board decision required the approval of 100% of shareholders. This meant that appointing a new director without the second shareholder’s consent would formally have had no force, because on this point the articles take priority over the standard provisions of the law.
We showed the client two lawful ways out of the deadlock:
1. apply to the court with a petition to wind up the company as a just and equitable measure;
2. within the same application, ask the court to apply alternative measures, for example an order on how the company’s affairs are to be conducted or for the buy-out of one shareholder’s stake by the other.
The articles limited the directors’ powers: any board decision required the approval of 100% of shareholders. This meant that appointing a new director without the second shareholder’s consent would formally have had no force, because on this point the articles take priority over the standard provisions of the law.
We showed the client two lawful ways out of the deadlock:
1. apply to the court with a petition to wind up the company as a just and equitable measure;
2. within the same application, ask the court to apply alternative measures, for example an order on how the company’s affairs are to be conducted or for the buy-out of one shareholder’s stake by the other.
We also warned about the risks: decisions taken bypassing the articles can be challenged by the missing shareholder as a breach of contract (under the law, the articles of a Cyprus company have the force of a contract between the shareholders and the company), and the shareholder could claim damages or a court injunction.
The articles of a Cyprus company have the force of a contract between the shareholders and the company itself. That is why breaching them is not a formality but grounds for a court claim.
Result
The client gained a clear understanding of the limits: changing the director and secretary without the second shareholder’s consent was legally risky.
Instead, we prepared the client to apply to the court for an alternative remedy, aiming at the buy-out of the missing shareholder’s stake, which would have unblocked the company’s management without taking the matter to liquidation.
Instead, we prepared the client to apply to the court for an alternative remedy, aiming at the buy-out of the missing shareholder’s stake, which would have unblocked the company’s management without taking the matter to liquidation.
Or message us in the messenger you prefer
Order the service
“Articles of Association and corporate structure audit”
“Articles of Association and corporate structure audit”
By clicking the “Order the service” button, you consent to the processing of personal data in accordance with the Privacy Policy
Our lawyer will contact you within two hours
Other cases